-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 742
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added support for vita target #1721
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello again :)
With these changes mio compiles and (mostly) works with
armv7-sony-vita-newlibeabihf
target with--cfg mio_unsupported_force_poll_poll --cfg mio_unsupported_force_waker_pipe
rust flags.
armv7-sony-vita-newlibeabihf
is a Tier 3 target with working std via newlib.The target has no
epoll
orkqueue
, onlypoll
andselect
and async pipes, so cfg flags are required for compilation. This is not an issue for devs using the target, since most if not all who work with it usecargo-vita
tool for building, and it automatically adds these flags toRUSTFLAGS
.
To be clear --cfg mio_unsupported_force_poll_poll/mio_unsupported_force_waker_pipe
is not meant to be used for normal development. It's only to overwrite the preferred polling/waking implementation.
Since vita doesn't have epoll or kqueue the preferred polling implementation is the poll(2)
one. It's a bit messy at the moment with cfg
are round this place (also see #1715), but once merged no develop should have to use a RUSTFLAG
to run Mio on vita.
* Like `espidf` it has no process API and thus no `CLOEXEC` * `sockaddr_in` is mildly different on this target, and has an additional field * no `ioctl`, so `set_nonblocking` for vita follows illumos * async pipes are implemented with `pipe2` syscall for this target
👍 LGTM.
Can we add a cargo check
to the CI here as well? I think the socket2 one can be copied.
Hi!
I can, but it won't compile without these cfg flags right now, and I'm not sure they should be added to ci checks. |
They were actually added to test the
If you can change them in this pr that would be great. I wanted to this myself in #1715, but I without rustup support for Solaris isn't quite a pain in the but to test. |
Updated PR - added Although for tokio we still need to set Maybe this implementation detail can somehow be exposed? (not in the scope of this PR of course) |
👍
This is technically Tokio depending on unspecific behaviour (see tokio-rs/tokio#5866 (comment)). Let's try resolve that in tokio-rs/tokio#5866. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, can't test, but the CI seems happy.
Thanks @nikarh |
Hey, sorry to bother you @Thomasdezeeuw, would it be possible to make a release with these changes? Thanks! |
With these changes mio compiles and (mostly) works with
armv7-sony-vita-newlibeabihf
target with--cfg mio_unsupported_force_poll_poll --cfg mio_unsupported_force_waker_pipe
rust flags.armv7-sony-vita-newlibeabihf
is a Tier 3 target with working std via newlib.The target has no
epoll
orkqueue
, onlypoll
andselect
and async pipes, so cfg flags are required for compilation.This is not an issue for devs using the target, since most if not all who work with it use
cargo-vita
tool for building, and it automatically adds these flags toRUSTFLAGS
.espidf
it has no process API and thus noCLOEXEC
sockaddr_in
is mildly different on this target, and has an additional fieldioctl
, soset_nonblocking
for vita follows illumospipe2
call for this target